English中文(简体)FrançaisEspañolالعربيةРусскийPortuguês

+86 0769 88380789

English
English中文(简体)FrançaisEspañolالعربيةРусский

Contact Us

  • Guangdong Unique Flavor Co., Ltd.
    • +86 18929267983info@cuiguai.com
  • Room 701, Building C, No. 16, East 1st Road, Binyong Nange, Daojiao Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province

    • Get samples now

    Natural vs. Artificial Labeling Laws in the US vs. EU: A Compliance Playbook for Flavor Manufacturers

    Author: R&D Team, CUIGUAI Flavoring Published by: Guangdong Unique Flavor Co., Ltd. Last Updated: Sep 27, 2026 WhatsApp & Telegram: +86 189 2926 7983 Email: info@cuiguai.com In flavor marketing, few words carry more commercial weight than “natural.” Consumers pay premiums for it, regulators police it, and competitors litigate around it. Yet the meaning of “natural flavor” is not universal. Under United States law, the term is defined in 21 CFR § 101.22 as a category of flavoring ingredients. Under European Union law, the concept is defined differently in Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008, which reserves the word “natural” for flavouring substances and preparations obtained by specified processes. The same compounding sheet can therefore be lawfully described as “natural strawberry flavor” in Chicago and fail inspection in Berlin. For e-liquid flavor manufacturers, importers, and compliance managers serving both markets, this divergence is not an academic curiosity; it is a labeling, notification, and liability problem that must be solved before the first bottle ships. This guide explains the two regulatory architectures side by side: the FDA’s framework under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and 21 CFR § 101.22 on the US side, and the EU’s framework under Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008, its Union list of flavouring substances, and its specific rules for the term “natural” on the European side. It then translates the law into practical labeling steps for flavor concentrates and finished e-liquids. Because EU flavor labeling sits on top of a stricter product-notification regime, you should read this article together with our deep-dive on the EU TPD compliance framework for e-liquid ingredients, which covers Directive 2014/40/EU Article 20 notification requirements and the national flavor-ban patchwork that now affects eight member states.
    Compare US and EU rules for natural vs artificial flavor labeling: FDA definitions under 21 CFR 101.22, EU definitions under Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008, and what e-liquid flavor brands must do to label compliantly in both markets.

    Natural vs Artificial Flavor Labeling: US FDA 21 CFR 101.22 vs EU Regulation 1334/2008

    Why Labeling Law Is a Commercial Decision, Not Just a Legal One

    Labeling claims sit at the intersection of marketing and food law. A label that says “natural” when the formula contains a synthetic character impact compound such as ethyl vanillin is not merely inaccurate marketing; in the United States it can trigger a misbranding enforcement action under section 403(k) of the FD&C Act, and in the EU it can violate the labelling provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 enforced by national food-safety authorities. The consequences include warning letters, product detention at the border, recall campaigns, and damage to the trust that distributors and vape-shop retailers place in a flavor house. For B2B flavor concentrate suppliers the risk is amplified because the customer’s label is built from the supplier’s documentation. If the supplier’s ingredient list and natural/artificial classification are wrong, the brand owner’s finished-goods label is wrong, and every downstream unit is non-compliant. That is why compliance-minded buyers now audit flavor suppliers on documentation as rigorously as they audit them on price. The practical risk categories are:
    • Misbranding and false-claim exposure under US law, with penalties that scale with shipment volume.
    • EU market-access failure: without a correct natural/artificial classification and a compliant ingredient declaration, a product cannot pass the EU-CEG notification process or a member-state market surveillance check.
    • Retail and distribution rejection: major platforms and distributors increasingly require labeling declarations as a condition of listing.
    • Competitive disadvantage: a brand that mislabels “artificial” as “natural” wins short-term shelf appeal and loses long-term legal security.

    The United States: FDA and the Definitional Architecture of 21 CFR § 101.22

    In the United States, flavor labeling is governed primarily by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and its implementing regulations in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The controlling provision for flavor nomenclature is 21 CFR § 101.22, “Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives.” The regulation performs two functions that matter to flavor manufacturers: it defines the terms “natural flavor” and “artificial flavor,” and it dictates how those terms must appear on both the labels of flavors sold business-to-business and the ingredient statements of finished foods.

    What “Natural Flavor” Means Under the FDA Definition

    The statutory and regulatory definition of natural flavor is process-and-source based, not purity-based. Under 21 CFR § 101.22(a)(3), the term “natural flavor” or “natural flavoring” means the essential oil, oleoresin, essence or extractive, protein hydrolysate, distillate, or any product of roasting, heating or enzymolysis, which contains the flavoring constituents derived from a spice, fruit or fruit juice, vegetable or vegetable juice, edible yeast, herb, bark, bud, root, leaf or similar plant material, meat, seafood, poultry, eggs, dairy products, or fermentation products thereof, whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional. In plain language, a natural flavor must be derived from the enumerated natural source materials and must function as a flavoring. The definition deliberately excludes synthetic starting materials: a molecule made in a reactor does not qualify, even if it is chemically identical to a molecule found in a strawberry. Two consequences follow. First, the FDA’s definition is a list of processes (roasting, heating, enzymolysis, extraction) and sources (fruit, spice, herb, dairy, fermentation products), so a flavor can be “natural” under the regulation even if it was heavily processed, as long as the flavoring constituents originate from the enumerated sources. Second, the definition says nothing about consumer perception, organic status, or health. The FDA has never adopted a formal regulatory definition for the general label claim “natural” on finished foods; the term is policed through the flavoring definitions in § 101.22 and through the agency’s longstanding informal position that “natural” means nothing artificial or synthetic has been added to the food.

    What “Artificial Flavor” Means — and What It Does Not

    Section 101.22(a)(1) defines artificial flavor or artificial flavoring by exclusion: it means any substance whose function is to impart flavor that is not derived from the enumerated natural sources (spice, fruit or fruit juice, vegetable or vegetable juice, edible yeast, herb, bark, bud, root, leaf or similar plant material, meat, fish, poultry, eggs, dairy products, or fermentation products thereof). The category expressly includes substances listed in 21 CFR §§ 172.515(b) and 182.60 except where they are derived from natural sources. This matters for practical labeling because the artificial category is the residual one: if a character-impact compound is not derived from the listed natural sources, it is artificial for labeling purposes, regardless of how “natural” the overall profile tastes. The FD&C Act requires that a food bearing an artificial flavoring declare it. Section 403(k) of the Act mandates labeling whenever the food contains artificial flavoring, artificial coloring, or chemical preservatives. The declaration obligation falls on the finished-food label, and the burden of accurate classification flows upstream to the flavor supplier, who must be able to certify, in writing, that a flavor designated as containing no artificial flavor in fact contains none. That certification duty, discussed below, is one of the most frequently overlooked requirements in B2B flavor commerce.

    Labeling Flavors Sold Business-to-Business: The (g)(3) Rules

    For flavors shipped to food manufacturers rather than to consumers, 21 CFR § 101.22(g) prescribes the labeling of the flavor itself. Under paragraph (g)(3), a flavor containing solely natural flavor(s) must be labeled accordingly, for example “strawberry flavor,” “banana flavor,” or “natural strawberry flavor.” A flavor containing both natural and artificial components must be labeled, for example, “natural and artificial strawberry flavor.” A flavor containing only artificial components must be labeled, for example, “artificial strawberry flavor.” These three patterns are the vocabulary of US flavor labeling, and every concentrate label, specification sheet, and certificate of analysis a manufacturer issues should use them consistently. Paragraph (h)(1) then tells the finished-food manufacturer how to declare flavoring in the ingredient statement: spice, natural flavor, and artificial flavor may be declared as “spice,” “natural flavor,” or “artificial flavor,” or any combination thereof. Note the consequence: on a US ingredient statement, the consumer never learns which natural flavor is present unless the label makes a characterizing-flavor claim. The FDA also requires, under paragraph (i)(4), that a flavor supplier certify in writing that any flavor designated as containing no artificial flavor does not, to the best of its knowledge, contain artificial flavor, and that the certification be retained for at least three years. Manufacturers who combine flavors must obtain and keep these certifications as well. For manufacturers supplying markets beyond the US and EU, note that China operates its own additive and labeling regime under GB 41700-2022; our Chinese GB standards compliance guide for e-liquid additives explains that parallel system in detail.

    Characterizing Flavors: When “Natural” Must Appear on the Principal Display Panel

    Paragraph (i) of 21 CFR § 101.22 addresses the situation where a label, labeling, or advertising makes a representation about the primary recognizable flavor by word, vignette, or depiction. Once a food names or depicts a characterizing flavor such as strawberry, the declaration rules change. If the food contains no artificial flavor that simulates, resembles, or reinforces the characterizing flavor, the name of the food on the principal display panel must be accompanied by the common or usual name of the characterizing flavor in letters not less than one-half the height of the letters used in the name of the food. If the food is one commonly expected to contain the characterizing ingredient, such as strawberries in strawberry shortcake, and the food contains natural flavor derived from that ingredient, the name may be preceded by “natural” and followed by “flavored,” e.g., “natural strawberry flavored shortcake.” Two failure modes are common in the e-liquid world. First, if none of the natural flavor used in the food is derived from the product whose flavor is simulated, the product must be labeled with the flavor from which the flavor actually is derived, or as “artificially flavored.” A fruit vignette on a bottle whose strawberry character comes from synthetic ethyl methylphenylglycidate therefore demands “artificially flavored strawberry” treatment. Second, if the food contains both the characterizing flavor derived from the named source and other natural flavor that reinforces it, the label must add the phrase “with other natural flavor.” These half-height letter rules apply to the principal display panel, not only to the ingredient statement, and they survive even when the characterizing flavor and a brand mark are presented together.
    Understand the FDA definition of natural flavor and artificial flavor under 21 CFR 101.22, including (g)(3) B2B flavor labeling, (h)(1) ingredient statements, and (i) characterizing flavor display rules for e-liquid labels.

    21 CFR 101.22 Natural vs Artificial Flavor Definition for E-Liquid Labels

    The European Union: Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 and the Protected Meaning of “Natural”

    The EU regulates flavourings through a directly applicable regulation, Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on flavourings and certain food ingredients with flavouring properties for use in and on foods. The regulation was adopted on 16 December 2008, entered into force on 20 January 2009, and, from 20 January 2011, repealed the previous framework Directive 88/388/EEC. It lays down general requirements for the safe use of flavourings, defines the different types of flavourings, sets maximum levels for certain naturally occurring undesirable substances, and, in Chapter IV, contains the specific rules for labelling flavourings, including the conditions under which the term “natural” may be used. The European Commission maintains the implementing framework and the Union list of flavouring substances in Annex I, which was adopted by Regulation (EU) No 872/2012 on 1 October 2012 and is amended regularly.

    The EU Definition of “Natural Flavouring Substance”

    Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 establishes the EU’s classification of flavourings. It distinguishes flavouring substances, flavouring preparations, thermal process flavourings, smoke flavourings, flavour precursors, and other flavourings. Within that taxonomy, Article 3(2)(c) defines a “natural flavouring substance” as a flavouring substance obtained by appropriate physical, enzymatic or microbiological processes from material of vegetable, animal or microbiological origin, either in the raw state or after processing for human consumption by traditional food-preparation processes including drying, torrefaction, cooking or fermentation. Article 3(2)(d) defines a “natural flavouring preparation” through the same source-and-process test. The decisive contrast with the US approach is that the EU definition operates on the flavouring substance itself and is paired with a Union list: a substance that is not obtained by the qualifying processes is simply not “natural” for EU labelling purposes, even if it is identical in molecular structure to a naturally occurring compound. The practical consequence is that EU terminology is more protected than US terminology. Under US law, “natural flavor” is a defined food-ingredient category that a manufacturer applies to a flavor component. Under EU law, “natural” is a reserved descriptor that attaches to a substance or preparation satisfying a specific production-route test, and its use on labels is further restricted by Article 16 and Annex III, which require that when the term “natural” is used together with a reference to a food, food category, or vegetable or animal source, the flavouring component must be derived from that source. A product described as “natural strawberry flavouring” in the EU must therefore derive its strawberry character from strawberry, not from a blend of other natural materials that merely tastes like strawberry. The US system is more permissive at the point of the ingredient statement, because “natural flavor” does not name the source; the EU system is stricter precisely because the qualifier “natural” plus a named source creates a provenance claim.

    The Union List and the Authorisation System

    A second structural difference is the positive-authorisation model. Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 requires that flavouring substances used in or on foods be evaluated and included in the Union list in Annex I; substances not on the list may not be placed on the EU market as such. The list was assembled from the evaluations conducted by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) under the former programme of Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 and adopted through Regulation (EU) No 872/2012, with regular amendments since. For a flavor manufacturer, the practical implication is that each compound used in an e-liquid flavor destined for the EU must be on the Union list (or qualify as a flavouring preparation, thermal process flavouring, or other category outside the list), and the documentation trail must demonstrate this. GRAS status under the US Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association program is not a substitute: FEMA GRAS informs US self-regulation, while the EU operates a distinct, legally binding list.

    EU Labelling Rules: Chapter IV and the Conditions for “Natural”

    Chapter IV of Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 sets out the labelling rules for flavourings, both when sold business-to-business and when sold to final consumers, and the European Commission describes these as the specific requirements governing the use of the term “natural.” The core rule is that the term “natural” may be used for a flavouring only if its flavouring component contains exclusively flavouring substances and/or flavouring preparations meeting the Article 3(2)(c) and (d) definitions. Where the flavouring component is derived partly from non-qualifying sources, the label must reflect that reality. In addition, Annex III specifies the labelling terms, including “natural flavouring(s)” and the source-specific constructions such as “natural strawberry flavouring,” and requires the source named to match the source from which the flavouring component was actually obtained. B2B labelling of flavourings for sale to food producers must also include the appropriate name and, where relevant, the conditions of use, and the finished-food label must declare flavourings in the ingredient list under Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 on food information to consumers.

    The TPD Layer: E-Liquids Face Stricter Rules Than Food

    For e-liquid flavor concentrates sold into the EU, the food-flavouring rules are only the first layer. Directive 2014/40/EU, the EU Tobacco Products Directive, governs electronic cigarettes and refill containers under Article 20. Before any product is placed on the market, manufacturers and importers must notify it to the national competent authority through the EU Common Entry Gate (EU-CEG), including a complete list of ingredients and emissions data, at least six months before the intended marketing date. Labels must carry the standardized nicotine warning and a full ingredient list, and refill containers are limited to 10 ml with a 20 mg/ml nicotine cap. On top of that baseline, eight member states have adopted national flavor bans that restrict e-liquids to tobacco flavor, with more countries debating similar measures, and the forthcoming TPD revision is expected to introduce an EU-wide characterizing flavor restriction. For the current country-by-country picture and the Article 7(6) prohibited-additive categories, see our updated EU TPD forbidden-ingredients guide (linked in the introduction). The labeling conclusion for flavor manufacturers is simple: the EU market requires complete ingredient transparency at the compound level, and any “natural” claim must survive scrutiny under both 1334/2008 and the TPD notification file.
    How the EU defines natural flavouring substances and preparations under Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008, the Union list authorisation system, Chapter IV labelling rules, and how the TPD notification layer adds ingredient transparency duties for e-liquids.

    EU Regulation 1334/2008: Natural Flavouring Substance Definition and Labeling

    US vs EU at a Glance: Where the Two Regimes Diverge

    The table below condenses the structural differences that matter most when a single concentrate must carry documentation for both markets. Use it as a quick reference during label development and during supplier qualification.
    Dimension United States (21 CFR § 101.22) European Union (Reg. (EC) No 1334/2008)
    Definition of natural “Natural flavor” is a defined ingredient category: flavoring constituents derived from enumerated natural sources by processes such as extraction, roasting, heating, or enzymolysis (§ 101.22(a)(3)). “Natural flavouring substance” is a substance obtained by appropriate physical, enzymatic or microbiological processes from vegetable, animal or microbiological material (Art. 3(2)(c)); “natural flavouring preparation” is defined in Art. 3(2)(d).
    Artificial category Residual category: any substance imparting flavor not derived from the enumerated natural sources is artificial (§ 101.22(a)(1)). No single “artificial” label term for the category; flavouring substances must be on the Union list and the “natural” qualifier is reserved by law.
    Source naming Ingredient statements may simply say “natural flavor”; the source need not be named unless a characterizing-flavor claim is made (§ 101.22(h)(1), (i)). “Natural” used with a named source (e.g., strawberry) requires that the flavouring component be derived from that source (Annex III); provenance is a label claim.
    B2B flavor labels Three patterns: “natural strawberry flavor,” “natural and artificial strawberry flavor,” “artificial strawberry flavor” (§ 101.22(g)(3)). Flavourings sold B2B carry defined names and conditions of use under Chapter IV; the “natural” term is restricted by Article 16 and Annex III.
    Certification duty Written certification that a no-artificial flavor contains none, retained 3 years (§ 101.22(i)(4)). No US-style certification document, but the EU-CEG notification requires a complete ingredient list for every e-liquid product.
    E-liquid layer FDA Center for Tobacco Products regulates e-liquids as tobacco products; flavor ingredient safety still relies on food-grade GRAS assessment. TPD Article 20 notification with full ingredient and emissions data; 10 ml cap, 20 mg/ml nicotine cap; national flavor bans in 8 member states.
    Three conclusions follow from the table. First, the US system separates the ingredient-statement “natural flavor” declaration from the consumer-facing characterizing-flavor claim, while the EU system makes “natural” a provenance claim whenever a source is named. Second, the EU is a positive-authorisation market for flavouring substances, while the US relies on GRAS self-assessment with FDA oversight. Third, e-liquid flavor concentrates are governed in both jurisdictions by the food-flavouring rules as the technical baseline, but the TPD adds a mandatory transparency layer in the EU that has no equivalent at the US federal level for flavor formulations.

    Practical Compliance Steps for Brand Owners, Importers, and Compliance Managers

    Build a Jurisdiction-Specific Ingredient Dossier

    The single most effective investment a flavor buyer can make is a compound-level dossier per SKU. For the US, the dossier should classify every flavoring component as natural or artificial under the § 101.22(a)(3) / (a)(1) definitions, state the FEMA GRAS number where applicable, and include the supplier’s written no-artificial certification where claimed. For the EU, the dossier should map every substance to the Union list, identify the relevant Article 3(2) category, and confirm that any “natural” claim traces to a qualifying source and process. Keep the dossier under version control and require suppliers to update it whenever the formula changes.

    Draft the Label With the Rule Text in Front of You

    Label development should start from the regulatory text, not from marketing. In the US, check whether any word, vignette, or depiction creates a characterizing-flavor representation; if it does, verify the half-height letter rule, the “natural…flavored” construction, and the “with other natural flavor” phrase where applicable. In the EU, verify that the proposed descriptor (“natural strawberry flavouring,” “flavouring,” etc.) is permitted by Annex III and matches the actual sourcing. A useful discipline is to create a label matrix: for each market, list the planned panel text, the rule that authorizes it, and the documentation that proves it.

    Keep Certification Files for Three Years (US)

    The certification duty of 21 CFR § 101.22(i)(4) is a record-keeping obligation with enforcement teeth. Certifications must be retained throughout the period in which the flavor is supplied and for at least three years afterward, and they must be made available to FDA investigators upon request. Because the certification is treated as a report to the government, a false certification exposes the signer to serious penalties. Importers should collect certifications from every upstream flavor supplier, store them centrally, and verify them during routine audits, especially when a concentrate is blended with other flavors before bottling, because the blending step creates its own certification obligation.

    Plan for EU-CEG Notification Lead Times

    EU market entry is not a launch-week activity. The TPD requires notification at least six months before the intended marketing date, with a complete ingredient list and emissions data. Since the notification file must be built from supplier documentation, a flavor concentrate with incomplete ingredient data effectively blocks compliant market entry. When selecting a flavor partner for EU distribution, confirm in writing that full ingredient disclosure at the compound level, including thermal transformation screening, will be delivered within the notification timeline. For flavor systems oriented to EU-restricted markets, a compliant tobacco profile with complete documentation is the strategic baseline; our tobacco flavor concentrate line is formulated for exactly that purpose, and for markets where cooling profiles remain lawful our cool flavor range ships with the same full-disclosure documentation pack.

    Common Pitfalls in Natural vs. Artificial Labeling

    • Claiming “natural” for a blend whose character impact comes from ethyl vanillin or other synthetic compounds: the US definition is source-based, and the EU definition is process-and-source based. Both reject the claim.
    • Using “natural and artificial strawberry flavor” in the wrong order or dropping the “artificial” qualifier entirely on a B2B concentrate label: (g)(3) prescribes the exact phrasings.
    • Ignoring vignettes: a strawberry image on the principal display panel is a characterizing-flavor representation and triggers the half-height letter and “artificially flavored” rules even if the ingredient statement is correct.
    • EU source mismatch: labeling “natural strawberry flavouring” when the strawberry character is derived from other natural materials violates the Annex III source-match rule even though every component is natural.
    • Missing certifications: failing to collect or retain the written no-artificial certification exposes both supplier and brand to liability and fails during FDA inspection.
    • Treating FEMA GRAS as a substitute for EU authorization: the Union list is legally binding and separate from GRAS status.

    What a Compliant Flavor Partner Should Provide

    The labeling rules described above only work in practice when the flavor supplier treats documentation as part of the product. A compliance-ready flavor manufacturer should provide, for every SKU: a compound-level ingredient disclosure; a natural/artificial classification under both the US and EU definitions; FEMA GRAS references and Union-list mapping; a written no-artificial certification where applicable; allergen and prohibited-substance declarations; and a specification sheet that names the flavor in the (g)(3) pattern. When those documents are in place, the brand owner’s label can be drafted, the EU-CEG file can be assembled, and the US ingredient statement can be verified in hours rather than weeks. CUIGUI Flavor (Guangdong Unique Flavor Co., Ltd.) builds its B2B flavor concentrates around this documentation standard. Every e-liquid flavor we ship is supported by full ingredient disclosure, market-specific classification guidance, and compliance consultation that covers US 21 CFR § 101.22, EU Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008, and the TPD notification layer. Whether you are labeling a new fruit profile for the US market or restructuring a portfolio for EU flavor-ban compliance, the same discipline applies: define the flavor, classify it, document it, and label it exactly as the governing law requires.
    A closing compliance checklist for e-liquid flavor manufacturers and importers: ingredient dossiers, US certifications, EU-CEG notification planning, and what a documentation-ready flavor partner such as CUIGUAI Flavor should deliver.

    E-Liquid Flavor Labeling Compliance: Natural vs Artificial Documentation Checklist

    Need technical help with a US or EU label? Talk to our flavor chemists and compliance team. 📞 Phone: +86 0769 8838 0789 🌐 Website: https://www.cuiguai.com 📧 Email: info@cuiguai.com 💬 WhatsApp & Telegram: +86 189 2926 7983  Free samples and a label documentation review are available on request for qualified brands and importers.

    References

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 21 CFR § 101.22 — Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-101/subpart-B/section-101.22 European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 of 16 December 2008 on flavourings and certain food ingredients with flavouring properties for use in and on foods, EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008R1334 European Commission, Food Safety — Flavourings: EU Rules (definitions, Union list, and Chapter IV labelling requirements for the term “natural”). https://food.ec.europa.eu/food-safety/food-improvement-agents/flavourings/eu-rules_en European Parliament and Council, Directive 2014/40/EU (EU Tobacco Products Directive), Article 20 (e-cigarette notification, labelling, and ingredient disclosure), EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0040
    For a long time, the company has been committed to helping customers improve product grades and flavor quality, reduce production costs, and customize samples to meet the production and processing needs of different food industries.

    QUICK LINKS

    PRODUCTS

    Friendship link

    CONTACT  US

  • Guangdong Unique Flavor Co., Ltd.
    • telegram +86 189 2926 7983info@cuiguai.com
  • Room 701, Building C, No. 16, East 1st Road, Binyong Nange, Daojiao Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province

    • ABOUT  US

    The business scope includes licensed projects: food additive production. General projects: sales of food additives; manufacturing of daily chemical products; sales of daily chemical products; technical services, technology development, technical consultation, technology exchange, technology transfer, and technology promotion; biological feed research and development; industrial enzyme preparation research and development; cosmetics wholesale; domestic trading agency; sales of sanitary products and disposable medical supplies; retail of kitchenware, sanitary ware and daily sundries; sales of daily necessities; food sales (only sales of pre-packaged food).

    Send Inquiry
    WhatsApp

    Request Inquery